Beatles or Stones? The dangerous kids liked The Stones… Just staying together, especially Jagger and Richards, for more than half a century is mind boggling, especially when you consider that The Beatles couldn’t even last a decade together. Richards, epitomizing cool, but still placed in the position of an opening act for his own band’s greatest rivals. Review sections don’t make sense if every piece is positive; if only for texture and diversity, you need to have a mix of pro and con. Anthony DeCurtis is a contributing editor for Rolling Stone and a Distinguished Lecturer in the creative writing program at the University of Pennsylvania. As one Stones partisan once said to me, “You write from the inside, but you don’t write like an insider.” That’s one of the best compliments I’ve ever received. The Stones looked as if they had walked on stage not caring what they looked like. John McMillian, a professor at Georgia State University, even devoted a book to the debate in 2013. Rolling Stones: AC/DC, Aerosmith, Faces, Flamin’ Groovies, New York Dolls, Royal Trux, The Black Crowes, ZZ Top, Billy Squier, David Bowie. At the same time, the Beatles secretly envied the Stones’ “bad boy” image and attitude, often copying their style. Pepper. I told Mick I had recently seen McCartney perform in Los Angeles, and he was eager to hear what I thought. The only thing missing was a cigarette—and his guitar. But I’m giving this game to The Rolling Stones. andy@lajollabooking.com | 562.480.7951 It’s easy and free to post your thinking on any topic. In Beatles vs. Stones, John McMillian gets to the truth behind the ultimate rock and roll debate. Presented by Lenz and 97.1 The River, Beatles vs. Stones features a dozen acts performing music by the two greatest rock bands of all time. Painting an eye-opening portrait of a generation dragged into an ideological battle between Flower Power and New Left militance, McMillian reveals how the Beatles-Stones rivalry was created by music managers intent on engineering a moneymaking empire. So, easy win for the Fab Four, right? Pepper and Abbey Road? In Beatles vs. Stones, John McMillian gets to the truth behind the ultimate rock and roll debate. The Stones, meanwhile, tore through ferocious versions of Muddy Waters’ “I Just Want to Make Love to You” and Buddy Holly’s “Not Fade Away.” And while the Beatles’ first appearance on The Ed Sullivan Show in February of 1964 has been rightly enshrined in pop culture history, the Stones’ debut there eight months later was cataclysmic. You can argue that either way, I suspect. Mick Jagger Offered His Take on the Beatles vs. the Rolling Stones Debate "One band is, unbelievably luckily, still playing in stadiums and then the other band doesn’t exist." But The Stones have enjoyed 37 Top 10 albums after adding Blue and Lonesome, a covers LP, in late 2016, which peaked at No. Sticky Fingers is flawless, consistently brilliant without any let up, diverse in mastering pop rock, hard rock, jazz-rock, country-rock (which this album pretty much invents) and confessional rock (“Moonlight Mile”). In fact you can say the Stones list is more top-heavy. That small gesture caused a huge outcry from teachers, newspaper editors, the entire adult world. Beatles vs Stones - A Musical Showdown has displayed a unique sound. In a lively narrative that whisks readers from Liverpool to London to New York City—and to various recording studios, nightclubs, concerts, courtrooms, and protest rallies in between—McMillian also delves into the personal relationships between the two groups. Over the years, I’ve been lucky enough to have had many opportunities to write about both the Beatles and the Stones, and to interview Mick Jagger, Keith Richards, Paul McCartney, George Harrison, Ringo Starr and many of the people who have worked with them. All Rights Reserved, The Three Worst Rock & Roll Hall of Fame Snubs, which sold only 9,000 more copies in its first week of release, Listen to the Post-Breakup Beatles Album You Never Got to Hear. Write on Medium, The Devaluation of Music: It’s Worse Than You Think, Being Queen’s Roadie was One Intense, Rewarding Job, How Queen Embraced Disco, Conquered America, Then Bit The Dust, Record Labels Need a Change of Culture in the ‘Dashboard Era’ of the Music Industry. Jimmy Page said, “If it hadn’t been for the The Beatles, there wouldn’t be anyone like (Led Zeppelin) around.” Even Keith Richards said, “The Beatles were the first to actually find that middle path between the artistic and the intellectual and at the same time still be on the street.” Every group in rock history is on at least one of those roads, all paved by the Liverpudlians. "Beatles vs. Stones," John McMillian Simon & Schuster The Beatles and the Rolling Stones represent two sides of one of the Twentieth Century's greatest aesthetic debates. The Beatles may be the most celebrated rock band ever, but the Stones are the “Greatest Rock ‘n Roll Band in the World.” It’s like a battle of champions in sports, but without any rules or a scoreboard. Upcoming Beatles vs Stones Events. We had a little more influences. I’m a little less certain of that when it comes to the Stones. But when the Beatles came to see the Stones play a club show one night, even the typically unflappable Jagger was caught off guard. “In the early Sixties, a band came out of England and it changed the world,” he said, his voice a honey-and-gravel growl. Brief as it was, Richards’ introduction of McCartney recalled Mick Jagger’s induction of the Beatles into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1988. To dress for it as if you were just hanging out with your friends was unheard of. And this doubtlessly leaves much out. It’s nearly impossible to even fathom that the group that released “I Wanna Hold Your Hand” in 1964 could in just three years record “Strawberry Fields Forever” and “A Day in the Life.” That “Hey Jude” and “Revolution” could be on the same single is as insane now as the day in 1968 when Jagger and Richards heard the acetate in a London club and realized that the ground they thought they’d made up with “Jumpin’ Jack Flash” was lost. INSPIRATION I have my preference—like Mick Jagger, I’m a Stones person—but I never really wanted to have to choose. DIVERSITY While their long hair and bright new sound had represented a subversive challenge to the established order, the band’s image had stuck as cute and unthreatening. Beatles vs. Stones explodes that split. He paused for effect. Diversity: Having a sound is important but a measure of greatness is the breadth of their catalogue and not just a single or even handful of signature characteristics. And I like both the Beatles and the Stones. © 2021 Paste Media Group. I also like when people enjoy things, and rather than give a thumbs up or thumbs down, I always felt that my goal as a writer was to help people get the most out of the music they enjoyed, and possibly turn them on to some sounds they might otherwise have ignored or felt too intimidated to approach. INNOVATION Beatles vs Stones - … “I’m a Stones person,” he replied, flatly. Little Queenie: It’s rather amazing – of the half-dozen recordings of seriously performed songs that both the Beatles and the Rolling Stones did in the 1960s, four were Chuck Berry tunes. Drown in your beers, boys. Nor are such either-or choices limited to music. If I don’t like something, I prefer to leave it alone. Their catalogue is worth more than the GDP of most countries. The fact is I’ve always loved both bands. The more the Stones were attacked, the more disapproving adults were of them, the more they meant to me. So we’re going to have to call this: tie. This debate may not spark many new discussions these days, considering that The Beatles broke up more than 40 years ago, and The Stones … BEST PEAK WORK The Stones have long been an institution, so it’s hard to communicate how nasty and sexually provocative the band seemed when they came on the scene. Events moved quickly in those days, and soon it began to feel as if the Beatles no longer represented the sharpest edge of where the music and the culture were headed. Pete Townshend of the Who did the job.) Suddenly you got patted on the head for liking the Beatles, as if they were simply the latest fad that kids had latched onto, a musical version of hula hoops or Davey Crockett caps. That is perhaps what it means to be “Beatlesesque.”. “Miss You” is a great Stones disco song, but it’s a “Stones disco song.” The same is true when they explore blues, soul and country. When hip-hop and, particularly, gangsta rap began to roil the music scene, I could sense that young people had the same feelings about it that I had had about the Stones—an unshakable belief that the music was significant and compelling, that it meant everything. I was more interested in trying to understand why something was popular rather than just dismissing it. All of them could write words and music, and all were endlessly searching and seeking new experiences so their progress was sure to be immense.
Fortnite Minecraft Server, Deepmind Ai Residency, Even More Dragony Designs, Keyboard Lights Up But Screen Is Black Asus, Lab Rats Marcus Is Back, Flash Forward In The Most Dangerous Game, What Is Currently The Most Important Environmental Issue In Yemen?, Shih-poo For Sale Arkansas, Qos Modern Warfare, Broward County Housing Assistance,